On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 06:53:54PM +0200, Roel VdB wrote:
> CH> Hello everyone!
>
> CH> What batch/GUI front-end does everyone use for lame under Windoze?
>
> CH> I've been using lamebatch 0.99 and have discovered that it has some
> CH> major problems:
>
> lamebatch :)
>
> CH> Cannot control lame command-line options correctly,
> CH> The -V number does not have the correct effect,
>
> use the variable bit rate pull down box and choose the vbr switch
> there.
> (check my http://www.r3mix.net or http://r3mixnet.cjb.net for
> examples)
>
> it works.
No, it DOESN'T work.
First of all, what's up with the bitrate menu? Is it the -b or -B ?
And why is it you HAVE to choose one?
But the biggest problem is I made several encodings with every option
the same except the -V (variable quality). I made batches with 0, 1, 2,
3, & 4. I couldn't understand the relationship between the size of the
files and the -V number. In otherwords -V0 > -V1 > -V2 > -V3 > -V4
relationship to file sizes was NOT true.
Then I did everything with the command line and got entirely different
results.
I THINK THAT THE LAMEBATCH LINK SHOULD BE TAKEN OFF OF THE LAME WEBPAGE.
I've spent many hours confused with what I thought was lame and it turned
out to be lamebatch...
> CH> Does not compute the ETA times correctly.
>
> correct. wrote the author about this 6 months ago, and he can't fix.
>
> CH> (if the lamebatch author sees this please take note)
>
> not much chance. 1- he's busy now 2- he lost the source code.
>
> CH> Any suggestions for a decent alternative welcome...
>
> There will be a new lamebatch in july. I don't know any better,
> sorry.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Roel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
