Hello Greg,
Monday, June 26, 2000, 7:45:22 AM, you wrote:
GM> Us lesser engineers have to show off more.. :P
dilbert joke
GM> Anyways, I'm tired of seeing perceptual codecs blasted because of stupid
GM> non-perceptual tests.. (which this wasn't but it was close) so it was fun
GM> to do something about it..
ahum, the listening tests also came out very poor imho (as in: clearly
clicks and other artifacts in the first sample I used to encode). as ever, I
only use the sweep to show some defects. it's just that I only read
positive things of ogg vorbis, and was expecting very much. probably
too much. also, for the moment my mp3's, to be considered
transparent, are about 170kbit/s average. why are you aiming at
130-150kbit? be aware that on better Q systems you hear a difference,
and imho it wouldn't be bad to get better quality at higher size.
just a thought.
--
Best regards,
Roel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
