Benjamin Reed wrote- >so I'm forking a single lame --decode and then piping that to muliple encode >processes (to save decoding for each stream). It's possible to call lame.exe multiple times without having the thing crash. Therefore it seems strange to me that one requirement for being part of the ACM (which is that multiple instances must be possible) is not met by Lame. I don't get it... Is it because the ACM uses a library instead of an executable? Is it possible to call an EXE through the ACM? Shawn -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] Weird question... Benjamin Reed
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Weird question... benoit rouits
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Weird question... Benjamin Reed
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Multiple instances? (Was &quo... Shawn Riley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Multiple instances? (Was ... Mathew Hendry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Multiple instances? ... Shawn Riley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Multiple instances? (Was ... Benjamin Reed
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Multiple instances? ... Shawn Riley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Weird question... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Weird question... Benjamin Reed
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Weird question... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Weird question... Benjamin Reed
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Weird question... Mark Taylor
