> It's possible to call lame.exe multiple times without
> having the thing crash. Therefore it seems strange to
> me that one requirement for being part of the ACM
> (which is that multiple instances must be possible)
> is not met by Lame. I don't get it... Is it because
> the ACM uses a library instead of an executable? Is
> it possible to call an EXE through the ACM?
I'm using LAME on Linux, so no lame.exe for me... :) I don't really know
anything about LAME internals... what is an ACM? Or is that some kind of
Windows thing?
I presume under Linux, running LAME multiple times creates a separate
process for each one. ??
--
Ben Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
DJ In A Box: http://defiance.dyndns.org/
Defiance MP3 Radio: http://radio.scenespot.org/
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
