Roel VdB schrieb am Mit, 27 Sep 2000:
> 3.86 (nommx)
> > average: 235 kbs
>
> 3.87 nommx:
> > average: 225.8 kbps
>
> 3.87 MMX
> > average: 224.6 kbps
>
> remarks:
> 1) 3.87 MMX is smaller, yet it sounds better (???) (velvet JS noise)
does it sound better than 3.87 non-MMX or 3.86?
> 1b)3.87 -V1 is 20% faster than 3.86 (thanks Robert!)
> 1c)3.87 -V1 MMX is 35% faster than 3.86 (thanks Takehiro!)
> 2) I miss the # of frames in each bitrate mode. The new real-time %
> data looks really neat, but please re-instate the # frames.
> 3) Would be really something if it would also say [total# frames/total
> # of S frames/ total # of M/S frames]. Room enough on the lines :)
> 4) Why does the MMX mode and non-MMX mode give different output on my
> Cel450/Win95OSR2? Isn't MMX supposed to give same results?
On my Linux Box with a Pentium 166 MMX the MMX and non-MMX
version produce bit identical results.
At least your 3.87 MMX version seems to be compiled with the
Makefile.MSVC I checked in, with RH_AMP and RH_VALIDATE_MS
enabled. Dmitry, is that right?
Ciao Robert
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
