Gabriel Bouvigne schrieb am Don, 28 Sep 2000: > > At least your 3.87 MMX version seems to be compiled with the > > Makefile.MSVC I checked in, with RH_AMP and RH_VALIDATE_MS > > enabled. Dmitry, is that right? > > Should they be considered as default switches? In this case, why aren't they > defined in the VC project? From my point of view yes, but not necessarily. I've no VC5, so I don't maintain these project files. Ciao Robert -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX give different resu... Roel VdB
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX give diffe... Nathan D. Blomquist
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX give diffe... Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX give d... Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX gi... Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX give d... Mark Powell
- [MP3 ENCODER] MMX support Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX gi... Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MM... Mark Powell
- [MP3 ENCODER] Re: 3.87b MMX and no MMX gi... Dan Nelson
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: 3.87b MMX and n... Mark Powell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: 3.87b MMX and n... Frank Baumgart
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MMX gi... Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and no MM... Mark Powell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.87b MMX and ... Robert Hegemann