In article by David Balazic:
> > DB> - also limit the mail size to 10k or so ( as you already did )
> > also too severely, imho 15-20 would be better. but 10k removes mails
> > from guys that like to quote full previous mail(really hate this), so
> > also not bad.
> > but what about patches?
Anything bigger then 10K gets bounced to me, I can still eyeball what's
in the mail and let it through if appropriate. As I said before, this
only affects 0.28% of the postings to the mp3encoder list.
Cheers all,
Warren
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list archive is at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mp3encoder%40minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/
- [MP3 ENCODER] Thoughts on mp3encoder posting policy Warren Toomey
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Thoughts on mp3encoder posting pol... Koch Tibor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Thoughts on mp3encoder posting pol... Maroy Akos
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Thoughts on mp3encoder posting pol... Thomas Zimmerman
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Thoughts on mp3encoder posting pol... David Balazic
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] Thoughts on mp3encoder posting ... Dmitry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Thoughts on mp3encoder posting pol... David Balazic
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Thoughts on mp3encoder posting pol... Warren Toomey
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Thoughts on mp3encoder posting pol... Maroy Akos
