On 27 Dez, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> a) When I use LAME 3.90 my internet connection gets cut frequently (in the
> meantime i've tried out what you proposed in your first letter, as you then
> considered that EAC + LAME might cause the trouble. I used Razorlame and
> other front ends and tried to run LAME 3.90 from the command line. No
> change, connection always gets cut. I think at least we can stop the "front
> end discussion" by that)
Yes.
> b) I have frequently used LAME 3.89 since I wrote my first mail and the
> results are very satisfying. I never got cut when using it, regardless of
> the front end I used.
> c) No other encoder ever "triggered the same bug" which you assume is
> somewhere in my OS.
> d) My CPU is not overclocked.
Good, one checkpoint less.
> And just to answer your question from your other mail: My network card is a
> "3Com EtherLink XL 10/100"
Ok.
> Again (and I will now use your own words):
>
> It sems to be a fact, that LAME 3.90 triggers a bug in my system (including
> the OS), which LAME 3.89 and all previous versions don't trigger and which
> no other encoder I know ever triggered. So there must be a "material change"
> from version 3.89 to version 3.90, which might be capable of triggering bugs
> in some users' systems.
>
> And if you agree with that, I believe it would not be a minor reason for
> considering what has been changed and how to avoid that in future versions.
That's alot.
> Can we agree about this?
Sure.
What about my question about service packs? Doing an Windows update over
DSL should be fast (and perhaps ~200MB traffic, but I don't know).
What kind of CPU do you use. Dmitry also has other lame binaries
(compiled with different compiler options) if I remember correctly, can
you please try if every one of them shows this bad behavior?
Dmitry, can you please put a "failsafe" binary on your page, one with
very few compiler optimisations (one which should just run on every
processer and doesn't try to be smart and fast).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
To boldly go where I surely don't belong.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
