----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Does this mean that I should re-encode everything I've done > "--alt-preset fast standard" (no other swithches) with > 3.93? I sure hope not because that's about everything I > own, over 500 CD's.
I would; not because of the version number, but because of the "fast" method which produces inferior quality. (On a side note, the ability to sacrifice quality to gain encoding speed is the biggest mistake to ever put in a codec. This is also one of the main reasons I'm going 100% OGG - there's no "fast/low quality" vs. "very slow/best quality"; it's always best quality. No more downloading crappy encodings of songs in 320 kbps that sound like properly encoded songs at 96 kbps!) Just my two cents ;) Daniel _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
