Michael Atherton wrote:

> The answer to that question is one reason why a conservative would
> vote and support the Green party, and why the DFL is losing elections.

I have to believe that an election in ought-three would favor the Greens more than the 
DFL, if for no other reason than the greater the distance between trips to the polls 
the greater the chance for lost momentum.

More importantly, it seems pretty cut and dried that if the boundries are redrawn in 
such a way that a segment of the population is no longer represented at City Hall, 
then you need to have a new election. However, since the boundaries could 
theoretically change every ten years, and elections are currently held every four 
years, then this problem could reoccur at pretty regular intervals (if an election is 
held in
'03, then in '07, then in '11 you are right back to square one if the '10 census 
dictates another change).

One way to really keep things consistent would be to reduce the number of wards to say 
six, making the areas large enough that the census would be less likely to skew them, 
and elect (in this case seven) at-large Council Members, or (and this would be the 
better choice IMHO) reduce the Council terms from 4 years to 2 years and run the 
elections concurrent with congressional elections.

Just a thought,

richard carney
st. paul

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to