"Does anyone know why MPLS (and St. Paul) have their own licensing
requirements beyond the state requirements?

Good questions.  I suppose the original reasons go back decades. Perhaps the
state standards were not sufficient.  If the idea now is to protect people
from shady craftsmen, then the additional licenses are counterproductive.
The high costs just increase the temptation to hire
'non-union/non-licensed/non-insured' rip off artists.  This is especially
true of those, again, who can least afford it.

I have also had constractors tell me how frustrating it is to get work
inspected in Mpls so they can close out a job.  This doesn't matter to the
disreputable tradesmen, but it drives the consiensious ones.  And I have had
to go through my council member to get an electrical inspector out to sign
off on $5000 plus electrical work.

Along similiar lines, has anyone heard any more about snow plowing this
year, esp the alleys?

Anne McCandless
Jordan



REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to