Hi all,

Only an environmental assessment was done for the 35W
project--this is a weaker and smaller environmental
study.  When the expansion of 35-W was initially
proposed in the early nineties, an environmental
impact study would have been required due to the size
of the project.  The large project was widely opposed
by both citizens and politicians.  Much of that
initial, larger project is slated to be completed on a
smaller, piece by piece basis which will not require a
full EIS.  That is, even though much of the same
construction is being done, less environmental
evaluation is required because the project was
segmented.  

On another note, I am surprised by Dean Zimmerman's
argument in support of the project--as I understand
it, he seems to suggest that because we do not now
have a plan for a radical new mass transit system, we
should support an extremely debatable non-mass transit
system.  (I believe this is a reversal of his position
since his vote against the project on Tuesday)I am
also very dubious that voting for 35W will bring PRT
nearer--how do these two connect?  If the 35W project
is a bad project, it will still be a bad project even
if the city or state approves money to study or build
PRT.  There are quite plausible arguments for the
expansion--which I do not support--but this does not
seem to be one of them.
 
Best,
Jane Franklin
Phillips Neighborhood

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to