It may not technically be a lock out, but my point was that describing the
action as the union "walking off the job" was not accurate, either.  The
thread was about media bias, and I think that Blake's choice of words
indicates a slant that is not favorable to the union.  The significant part
that Blake left out of that piece and others is that the Met Council is
refusing to negotiate and they appeared eager for a strike and continue to
appear as if they don't care if the buses and trains run or not.  And please
note, I said 'appear;'  I read what P. Bell said.
Dan McGuire
Ericsson

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Brandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Media Outlets too Pro-Union in Bus Strike?


> A previous poster asks:   "Isn't it bothering you that every media
> outlet in town, pretty much, seems to give the union a free pass and
> isn't blaming them at all for this strike?"
>
> Brandt:  I can't answer your question because  I don't have time to
> take in every media outlet in town.  I'm impressed that this poster can
> watch  simultaneous TV broadcasts on all stations, hear all radio
> newscasts, read both metro dailies, the Minnesota Daily, all webcasts.
> and all the community papers, including every suburban paper, to be
> authoritative enough to make this judgment.  Most days I don't even make
> it through all of my own paper.
>
> Another poster suggests that the strike is actually a walkout because
> the "Met Council refused to negotiate further."  I've supervised union
> preparations for a possible strike by the Star Tribune Guild unit
> through several rounds of contract talks.  My understanding of a lockout
> is that the employer tells employees not to report for work, and
> prevents them from doing so.  In that case, workers would be eligible
> for unemployment compensation.  I don't think that applies here.
>
> Steve Brandt
> Star Tribune
>
> REMINDERS:
> 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
> 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
>
> For state and national discussions see:
http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
> For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
> ________________________________
>
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
> Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to