Anecdotal stories of victimization have great value.  They define who we are, what we 
fear, and what we hope to be.  These narratives help to set social rules and norms 
which in turn formulate community obligations and responsibilities.  In times of 
trouble, our stories become a call for action.  How do we proceed?

 

In most cases, community response is dictated by a logical measured response.  Have 
our action caused an effect. If so, how much?  

 

Silly statistics, in part, set budgets and therefore staffing.  How many cops are 
enough? What is the exact formula to determine policing resources? One, two, or three 
cops per thousand citizens? Why do some cities need more cops and others less per 
capita?   Despite the seriousness of current crime trends, there are citizens who 
would like to see fewer police.  They see the police as the private militia of the 
"privileged".  The police are akin to a brutal occupying force that trample the rights 
of citizens and crush liberty.

 

It's a delicate balance between keeping the peace and infringing upon people's 
freedoms.  It's quite caviler to claim the higher road, "no cost is too high for our 
citizens' safety".  Yet there is a bottom line. Safety and freedom have a price tag.  
It will be an uphill battle to raise taxes to return to past policing staffing.  I 
wish any current or future candidate who would advocate this track all the luck in the 
world.  Current budget projections show increases to police department funding in the 
next five years, yet staffing levels are projected to decline.  Public Safety is not 
immune to the higher cost of doing business.  Obviously, there will be further budget 
negotiations, with other City Departments seeing budget cuts to maintain or increase 
Public Safety.  Which cut is open to fare game?  What choices should be made? 

 

If we can't buy our way out of crime and poverty, perhaps we can lead ourselves from 
these maladies.   Mr. Graham illustrates that it can and has been done in his 
neighborhood.  It can be done on the Northside and elsewhere too.  One would expect to 
find, and there are plenty of, leaders in corporations, police departments, city 
offices, schools, churches and other social institutions.  The quality of these formal 
leaders is often subject of debate, and fairly so.  But there are leaders within our 
families, our neighborhoods, and within us.  The trick is harnessing the right leaders 
who are responsible, accountable, and understanding of and to the community.  I 
believe we have such leaders working within Minneapolis neighborhoods, some formal, 
some not.  Others do not share this faith.  That's politics, the struggle for 
legitimate control. 

 

If only institutional racism, and discrimination was at merely at direction of a 
select few. It's too widespread and mindless, which makes it so difficult to combat.  
Our solutions to crime and poverty do not need to be, as we can lead and apply a 
logical measured response.

 

G.W. Reinhardt

Excelsior

 
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to