Kurt Waltenbaugh asked about a property tax based only on the most recent
sale price and no property appreciation. How he proposed for it to work was
the following:
...if I purchase a house for $75k, invest $50k into remodeling, and have
estimated appreciation gains of $25k - I am only taxed at the 75k rate,
until I sell the house...
I have one word for Kurt: California. Possibly the most screwed up property
tax system in the country.
To rip from Wikipedia: "Under Proposition 13, the real estate tax on a
parcel of property is limited to 1% of its purchase price, adjusted for
inflation, until the property is resold. There is a maximum 2% increase
allowed in the assessed value per year, and property is reassessed when
additions or new construction occur. In addition, assessed values can be
temporarily reduced if the value of the home drops below the amount paid."
What have been the impacts of Prop 13? Prop 13 benefits the elderly who
have held onto their properties for a long time and penalize people trying
to get into the housing market. A severe shortage of affordable housing has
occurred. Corporations benefit as they are able to play shell games among
their various businesses where they can transfer property from business to
business without triggering the increased taxes.
Also local governments are not able to raise taxes to pay for needed
services. So in California governmental services are funded to a maze of
fees and assessments, much worse than St Paul. (a small jibe at my
neighbors to the east where they call taxes "fees".) J Also cities have had
increasingly had to turn to sales taxes because they can't get their
necessary funding through property taxes. The result is that a high retail
place like Roseville would be a great place to live but a low retail place
like Columbia Heights wouldn't have a chance. Cities end up in fierce
competition to attract businesses, which means cities provide large
incentives to lure businesses, many which provide unnecessary subsides to
businesses.
Also this has been bad for poor people. Poor people with less stable
incomes end up buying and selling property more frequently, which means
taxes tend to be higher on lower value homes. So you can have a poor person
who just bought a home paying substantially higher taxes than a older person
who has stayed put.
In short, it has been a disaster of tax policy. The property tax in
practice is strongly regressive; there little to no link between taxation
and wealth, the incentives in the system are not what you want to create a
healthy community, etc. Not a good way to go.
To read more about Prop 13:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_13_(1978)
Carol Becker
Longfellow
Future Member, Board of Estimate and Taxation
Geek
REMINDERS:
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@mnforum.org
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
