> Why, for example for libc.so.6 (needed to compile fpc himself), fpc does not
> use libc-dev and the libc.so created ?
Sory, I am hot, I cannot resist.
For me, fpc act as very selfish. For himself and the libraries needed to
compile himself ---> ok, the good soname is used.
But for all that fpc does need --> a wrong using of libxxx-dev.
Also, I did read the doc of linux- maintenance. The use of libxxx-dev is only
for C developpers who wants to test the last dev-release. And for this, they
may use the c headers provided by libxxx-dev + the "root-for-development"
libxxx.so.
And all the blabla that the fpc gurus give is only blabla of lazy and old
developers who do not want to change their mind.
But I see that nobody want to understand that I try to explain , so I give up.
(Trust me, it is very rare, I usually never give up).
FreD
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
mseide-msegui-talk mailing list
mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
