Morten,

The following is a disclaimer received when creating Java packages with Secunia CSI. Is the patch logic for Java and the detection of Java processes running on systems going to be addressed in CSI 7.0? As a workaround, we currently custom script them for proper Java detections, process terminations, and successful patching but it's tedious and long. Also, you may not be aware but in general, the SPS catalog does not get updated, sometimes for a few days when critical patches are released by vendors, therefore the task of distributing critical / security patches in a timely manner with Secunia becomes a major challenge.

"/Due to a bug in the Sun Java installer, this package can only be installed on target computers if Java is not running on them. Hence, all the applications that are using Java (primarily browsers) should be closed before installing the update.// //Note that as long as Java is running, this package will be listed as "Not Needed" for the computers.//
//Do you wish to create the package anyway?/"

Thanks.

-Harjit

On 5/9/2013 4:05 PM, Morten R. Stengaard wrote:
Todd,

First a disclaimer: I work for Secunia!

You are correct that customization of patches can still be challenging, and the 
patches provided out-of-the-box by companies like Secunia still have some 
limitations. Having said that, then what you are asking for, i.e. an easy way 
to customize the patches, is just around the corner, and we will introduce this 
in Secunia CSI 7.0, which is scheduled for release in Q3 this year. We are 
implementing some simple check boxes in the packaging wizard that allow users 
to for example disable auto-update and to remove the desktop shortcut, among 
other things to make it even easier to patch without having to spend time on 
modifying or repackaging the patches yourself.

I expect that we will release version 7 in beta in early July (in about two 
months), so if you - or anyone else - is interested in joining the beta program 
and testing the new solution, please send me a note, and I will be happy to 
include you in the loop.

Thanks,

Med venlig hilsen / Kind Regards,

Morten Stengaard
CTO

Secunia

Mobile +45 3046 3945


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Miller, Todd
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 6:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCUPDates

I have used a couple of the products.  What I have found is that they work OK 
for finding what needs to be patched, but for actual patching, noting is that 
great.  The problem is that there is no customization of the patches at all.  
They have made the patch package so you have to take what their packager thinks 
is best.

For example, let's say you want to patch Quicktime.  Basically what the 
patching systems do is put a wrapper around the Quicktime installer from Apple 
so that the installer can be deployed via WSUS.  If you don't mind taking the 
defaults, then you are OK.  That means you get a Quicktime desktop icon and 
Apple Automatic Updates  stays enabled (or gets reenabled) among other things I 
find undesirable.  If you want to have any customization then you end up 
needing to repackage the installer/updater/patch yourself anyway.  The tool can 
help with detecting and deployment, but you still have to build the patch 
yourself.

I haven't found a patching system yet that lets you just sit back and enjoy 
patching your third party products by clicking buttons.  Even Adobe Shockwave 
and Flash I had trouble with.  We deployed these controls with the MSI version 
originally and our patching tool deploys with the EXE.  People who have patched 
these probably know what I am talking about.  The patches that are deployed 
with the patching product leave automatic updates enabled (for adobe) and 
install without the backwards compatibility included in the MSI package.  When 
I tried to check in the packaged patch from our vendor, it ended up leaving the 
MSI install and installing the EXE along side  - so two copies of Shockwave in 
Add/Remove  - not too cool.

Anyway, what I am getting at is the patch process is eased somewhat by a 
patching tool - it helps tremendously in detecting what products are out of 
date.  But it is still a lot of work and testing to actually deploy an update 
with any product.  At least with a tool you can see how many systems need 
patching for a particular software product and that can help you prioritize 
your work.  I don't think you will be able to buy something and then just start 
checking in and deploying patches.  They don't really work that way in real 
life.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Clinton Arsenault
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 11:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCUPDates

Secunia gave us an impressive demo at MMS2013.  We are considering purchasing 
the product, but at this point we have not, so I don't have any true experience 
with it save the demo.

http://secunia.com/ <http://secunia.com/>

Thank you,
Have a great day



Clinton Arsenault
Windows System Administrator
Brunswick Enterprise IT
Direct (865)582-2306
Fax (920)907-2500
[email protected]

This email message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you 
are not the intended recipient, please delete the message and any attachments 
and notify the sender by return email. You should not retain, distribute, 
disclose, or use any of the information in this message. - Brunswick email 
policy  I.01.07-D




From:        "Hermes, Todd E." <[email protected]>
To:        "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
Date:        05/09/2013 12:19 PM
Subject:        [mssms] SCUPDates
Sent by:        [email protected]

________________________________




We are looking to extend our SCUP environment and we are looking at third party 
tools that integrate like Shavlik.  Can anyone make any other recommendations 
for easing the burden of applying third party updates?
Thanks,
Todd



**************************
This e-mail message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you 
are not the intended recipient, please delete the message and any attachments 
and notify the sender by return e-mail. You should not retain, distribute, 
disclose or use any of the information in this message.
**************************



________________________________

Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________









Reply via email to