they are going to have a difficult time getting the military to relinquish
control. I do not see it happening. Governments will not like it either.
Nor will big banks and others.

not gonna happen.


On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Marcum, John <[email protected]> wrote:

>  If Microsoft stops (since how I worded it the first time was taken out
> of context I’m being careful here) providing software that can be used in a
> private cloud, how will customers who simply cannot or will not run
> everything in a public cloud function?
>
>
>
> Microsoft never actually “Sold software” did they? Wasn’t that really the
> genius behind MS? The fact that they were actually selling you the license
> not the software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rod Trent
> *Sent:* Monday, July 08, 2013 1:28 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
> ser vice
>
>
>
> There haven’t been complete reversals, but there have been concessions.
>
>
>
> http://windowsitpro.com/cloud/theres-no-software-devices-and-services
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Thompson, Joseph W (Joe)
> *Sent:* Monday, July 08, 2013 2:16 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
> ser vice
>
>
>
> If it were to happen, it wouldn’t be the first time this year Microsoft
> has reversed an unpopular new policy….
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Jason Sandys
> *Sent:* Monday, July 08, 2013 1:08 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
> ser vice
>
>
>
> Just a note here. We’ve been told (the MVPs) that “Microsoft” is
> monitoring feedback on this. I’m about to forward this thread (because I
> mentioned it and it was requested) so please at least know that you are
> being heard – that’s all I can promise though.
>
>
>
> J
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *James Mymryk
> *Sent:* Monday, July 8, 2013 12:49 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
> ser vice
>
>
>
> Shutting down Technet is truely a disservice to IT pros and Trainers
> alike.  Without the cheap licensing how can you see how a product performs
> over time and then be able to apply upgrade processes etc to it and the
> previous version.  Currently I find i'm needing to juggle 3 versions 2007,
> 2012 RTM, and 2012 SP1 inorder to validate features and changes between
> versions, test upgrades and Migration scenarios that come forward.   R2
> coming out in the fall / winter, that will be 4th version.
>
>
>
> 2007 - Its in place, people are considering migrating from, sometimes need
> to health check or special reports.
>
> 2012 RTM - some can't go to SP1 yet because they have systems which don't
> support No execute.  In addition some are deployed and need support in
> migration to SP1
>
> 2012 SP1 - New version, testing updates etc and use it with the other 2 to
> test migrations
>
>
>
> In addition you have items you want to run through that generate a history
> for software updates, installed software, software metering rules etc.
>
>
>
> No way you want to end up having to rebuild this every 6 months and to get
> the same software, drives you to a MSDN Premium License to get the same
> software @ $6,119.00 now that's a heavy blow.
>
> James
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Michael Mott
> *Sent:* Monday, July 1, 2013 8:27 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
> service
>
>
>
> If we can get MMS back, why cant we swell up TechNet?
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Rod Trent
> *Sent:* Monday, July 01, 2013 5:38 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
> service
>
>
>
> No one does.  But, what alternative do you have right now?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Michael Mott
> *Sent:* Monday, July 01, 2013 5:10 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
> service
>
>
>
> Not really, I don’t want to rebuild labs every 6 months….
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Rod Trent
> *Sent:* Monday, July 01, 2013 5:04 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
> service
>
>
>
> 6 months is a pretty long time.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Jason Sandys
> *Sent:* Monday, July 01, 2013 4:08 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
> service
>
>
>
> I think the intent is for ITPros to use the 180 day evals for their own
> labs.
>
>
>
> J
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Rod Trent
> *Sent:* Monday, July 1, 2013 3:02 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
> service
>
>
>
> There’s also the virtual labs.  You no longer have to maintain special
> hardware.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Marcum, John
> *Sent:* Monday, July 01, 2013 3:22 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
> service
>
>
>
> Spinning up an Azure VM does not meet the requirement of MSDN software. I
> can’t test on my hardware, in my data center,  in my environment without
> MSDN or paying for software. Microsoft is going to push this Azure crap too
> hard and people are simply going to stop using MS software. People are
> heavily invested in the Microsoft skillset but other than the bodies
> running the systems there’s no other real dependency upon Microsoft. We
> could just as easily run on open source.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Rod Trent
> *Sent:* Monday, July 01, 2013 2:12 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription
> service
>
>
>
> Not really, when you think about it.  TechNet was used more for
> downloading software than any of the other benefits.  You can spin-up a
> Windows Azure VM and test the same software now.  No reason to have it
> on-premise for testing.  Plus, the other options they are offering as
> replacements are all free.
>
>
>
> They are keeping MSDN, though (for a while), so you can subscribe to that
> if you want to download bits.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Spinelli, Robert J
> *Sent:* Monday, July 01, 2013 2:37 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service
>
>
>
> This is pretty terrible, TechNet yearly subscription was great.
>
>
>
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-shut-down-technet-subscription-service-7000017541/
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Robert Spinelli | CTS | GTI | 575 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ,
> 07310, United States| T: +1.201.595.6820 | C: +1.917.538.6192 |
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended
> as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial
> instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market
> prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or
> accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or
> statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase &
> Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates. This transmission may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential, legally privileged, and/or
> exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any
> reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and
> any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that
> might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it
> is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and
> no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and
> affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from
> its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately
> contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in
> electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. Please refer to
> http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for disclosures relating to
> European legal entities.
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary
> user of this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
> delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
> bind 1E to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
> agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
> for such purpose.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>
>



Reply via email to