I think you maybe ok. One of our primary SUPs has over 20,000 clients and all of those roles outside of the RSP. It is a pretty beefy box though.
----- Dwayne Allen [email protected] (479) 310-0027 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Sean Pomeroy <[email protected]> wrote: > We are in the process of planning and testing patch deployment via SCCM. > > A high level overview of our infrastructure is as follows: > Primary in EMEA (MP, SUP, ACWP, DP, RSP, AISP) > Secondary in Americas (MP, SUP, DP) > Secondary in APAC (MP, SUP, DP) > > ~17,000 Clients (35% EMEA, 40% Americas, 20% APAC) > ~2,000 Servers (45% EMEA, 45% Americas, 10% APAC) > > At first we will only be patching clients. But servers will follow. > > Right now we are only testing patching on about ~500 PCs and all is going > smoothly. > > Once we move all clients to patching via SCCM, I am concerned our Primary > is going to be over loaded. > > I know MS documentation suggests SUP can handle 25,000 clients when it > co-exists with another role... But our Primary essentially has all roles. > > Should I push to stand up a separate server as a SUP in each region? > Or at least in place of the SUP on our primary? > > Thanks, > Sean > >
