That would be correct, SQL co-located. We do have an issue that whomever configured the system made one big VHD and diced it up into partitions for content, SQL and logs. Makes it a pain to expand partitions. It was dynamic too! I created separate VHDs to split up the partitions, just haven't had a big enough maintenance window to move everything yet. Maybe I should push for SSDs at the same time...
Did you just use PerfMon to monitor disk queue? On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 2:20:16 PM Dwayne Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > We did have some issues with our disk queues until we moved to SSDs so > that is something you will want to keep an eye. I'm assuming you are > co-locating SQL? > > ----- > Dwayne Allen > [email protected] > (479) 310-0027 > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Sean Pomeroy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> @Nick, I currently have it configured with a SUP in each region. >> I also have two IBCM SUPs configured for Americas and EMEA. >> But we only have roughly ~1,500 clients internet only at any given time. >> >> @Dwayne, >> Our Primary is a VM on a decently equipped box. >> It's currently assigned 4 CPUs and 64GB of ram. >> And we have plenty of resources free to assign more. >> The only thing we don't have is dedicated Disks/SSDs. :( >> >> On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 10:37:38 AM Dwayne Allen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I think you maybe ok. One of our primary SUPs has over 20,000 clients and >>> all of those roles outside of the RSP. It is a pretty beefy box though. >>> >>> ----- >>> Dwayne Allen >>> [email protected] >>> (479) 310-0027 >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Sean Pomeroy <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We are in the process of planning and testing patch deployment via SCCM. >>>> >>>> A high level overview of our infrastructure is as follows: >>>> Primary in EMEA (MP, SUP, ACWP, DP, RSP, AISP) >>>> Secondary in Americas (MP, SUP, DP) >>>> Secondary in APAC (MP, SUP, DP) >>>> >>>> ~17,000 Clients (35% EMEA, 40% Americas, 20% APAC) >>>> ~2,000 Servers (45% EMEA, 45% Americas, 10% APAC) >>>> >>>> At first we will only be patching clients. But servers will follow. >>>> >>>> Right now we are only testing patching on about ~500 PCs and all is >>>> going smoothly. >>>> >>>> Once we move all clients to patching via SCCM, I am concerned our >>>> Primary is going to be over loaded. >>>> >>>> I know MS documentation suggests SUP can handle 25,000 clients when it >>>> co-exists with another role... But our Primary essentially has all roles. >>>> >>>> Should I push to stand up a separate server as a SUP in each region? >>>> Or at least in place of the SUP on our primary? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Sean >>>> >>>> >>>
