We did have some issues with our disk queues until we moved to SSDs so that
is something you will want to keep an eye.  I'm assuming you are
co-locating SQL?

-----
Dwayne Allen
[email protected]
(479) 310-0027

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Sean Pomeroy <[email protected]>
wrote:

> @Nick, I currently have it configured with a SUP in each region.
> I also have two IBCM SUPs configured for Americas and EMEA.
> But we only have roughly ~1,500 clients internet only at any given time.
>
> @Dwayne,
> Our Primary is a VM on a decently equipped box.
> It's currently assigned 4 CPUs and 64GB of ram.
> And we have plenty of resources free to assign more.
> The only thing we don't have is dedicated Disks/SSDs. :(
>
> On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 10:37:38 AM Dwayne Allen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I think you maybe ok.  One of our primary SUPs has over 20,000 clients
>> and all of those roles outside of the RSP.  It is a pretty beefy box
>> though.
>>
>> -----
>> Dwayne Allen
>> [email protected]
>> (479) 310-0027
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Sean Pomeroy <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We are in the process of planning and testing patch deployment via SCCM.
>>>
>>> A high level overview of our infrastructure is as follows:
>>> Primary in EMEA (MP, SUP, ACWP, DP, RSP, AISP)
>>> Secondary in Americas (MP, SUP, DP)
>>> Secondary in APAC (MP, SUP, DP)
>>>
>>> ~17,000 Clients (35% EMEA, 40% Americas, 20% APAC)
>>> ~2,000 Servers (45% EMEA, 45% Americas, 10% APAC)
>>>
>>> At first we will only be patching clients. But servers will follow.
>>>
>>> Right now we are only testing patching on about ~500 PCs and all is
>>> going smoothly.
>>>
>>> Once we move all clients to patching via SCCM, I am concerned our
>>> Primary is going to be over loaded.
>>>
>>> I know MS documentation suggests SUP can handle 25,000 clients when it
>>> co-exists with another role... But our Primary essentially has all roles.
>>>
>>> Should I push to stand up a separate server as a SUP in each region?
>>> Or at least in place of the SUP on our primary?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sean
>>>
>>>
>>
>


Reply via email to