@Nick, I currently have it configured with a SUP in each region. I also have two IBCM SUPs configured for Americas and EMEA. But we only have roughly ~1,500 clients internet only at any given time.
@Dwayne, Our Primary is a VM on a decently equipped box. It's currently assigned 4 CPUs and 64GB of ram. And we have plenty of resources free to assign more. The only thing we don't have is dedicated Disks/SSDs. :( On Wed Jan 28 2015 at 10:37:38 AM Dwayne Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you maybe ok. One of our primary SUPs has over 20,000 clients and > all of those roles outside of the RSP. It is a pretty beefy box though. > > ----- > Dwayne Allen > [email protected] > (479) 310-0027 > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Sean Pomeroy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> We are in the process of planning and testing patch deployment via SCCM. >> >> A high level overview of our infrastructure is as follows: >> Primary in EMEA (MP, SUP, ACWP, DP, RSP, AISP) >> Secondary in Americas (MP, SUP, DP) >> Secondary in APAC (MP, SUP, DP) >> >> ~17,000 Clients (35% EMEA, 40% Americas, 20% APAC) >> ~2,000 Servers (45% EMEA, 45% Americas, 10% APAC) >> >> At first we will only be patching clients. But servers will follow. >> >> Right now we are only testing patching on about ~500 PCs and all is going >> smoothly. >> >> Once we move all clients to patching via SCCM, I am concerned our Primary >> is going to be over loaded. >> >> I know MS documentation suggests SUP can handle 25,000 clients when it >> co-exists with another role... But our Primary essentially has all roles. >> >> Should I push to stand up a separate server as a SUP in each region? >> Or at least in place of the SUP on our primary? >> >> Thanks, >> Sean >> >> >
