Correct.

*-----------------------------------------------*

*Adam Juelich*

Pulaski Community School District <http://www.pulaskischools.org>

Client Management Specialist

920-822-6075


On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:29 AM, ccollins9 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok, you said OSD "refresh".  I might not be familiar with that.  I'm
> assuming a refresh is a reimage where SCCM takes into account that the
> computer is an existing object in SCCM and AD.  Is this correct?
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Juelich, Adam <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You don't have to delete ANYTHING in order to do an OSD refresh on a
>> machine.
>>
>> *-----------------------------------------------*
>>
>> *Adam Juelich*
>>
>> Pulaski Community School District <http://www.pulaskischools.org>
>>
>> Client Management Specialist
>>
>> 920-822-6075
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:16 AM, ccollins9 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Unless I missed where someone mentioned otherwise, I don't think it's
>>> possible to re-image without deleting from at least AD.  If you just simply
>>> rename a computer, SCCM will pick up that change and rename the object
>>> within SCCM because the GUIDs are the same.  Same with AD, a rename is fine
>>> because the SID remains the same.  But when you re-image a computer, the AD
>>> SID and SCCM GUID are now different and it's treated as a new object.  SCCM
>>> will allow duplicate names with different GUIDs, but AD won't allow
>>> duplicate names at all.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Chris Carbone <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  The problem is we do not want these objects getting deleted at all.
>>>> Our ticketing system pulls from SCCM so when you start deleting objects and
>>>> adding new objects, our ticketing system is becoming littered with old
>>>> computer names.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We want to reimage a computer, and if the name is different, we need it
>>>> to stay associated with the same object in SCCM. We want the object for a
>>>> computer entered one time, and it always lives in AD/SCCM even if renamed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully this makes sense.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Juelich, Adam
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 02, 2015 11:45 AM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm
>>>> object
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What Steve said...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You should have a naming convention and then stick to it to prevent the
>>>> issues you are creating.  Rename the machines at the end or after the
>>>> fact.  Your TS should be zero-touch unless you're dealing with bare-metal.
>>>> Otherwise, delete the object and handle it that way.  If the machines are
>>>> being re-purposed for a different area you'll most likely want to delete
>>>> the object anyways depending on how you're doing Application deployment.
>>>> You don't want the machine to automatically get deployed applications it
>>>> may no longer need (again, depending on how you're deploying and how you're
>>>> creating your collections).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    *-----------------------------------------------*
>>>>
>>>> *Adam Juelich*
>>>>
>>>> Pulaski Community School District <http://www.pulaskischools.org>
>>>>
>>>> Client Management Specialist
>>>>
>>>> 920-822-6075
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:27 AM, ccollins9 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  How are you all dealing with the object in AD?  AD doesn't allow
>>>> duplicate names, so AFAIK the only way to make sure the newly imaged
>>>> computer gets in AD properly is to either first delete the old object in
>>>> AD, or go into AD, find the computer, right-click and select and click
>>>> "reset account" before the TS joins the computer to the domain.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This whole thread may lead me to also fully automating this, as we
>>>> currently have helpdesk members delete the old computer from SCCM and AD
>>>> first, and if I do automate it, I think my first attempt would be to use
>>>> the PowerShell commands Remove-CMDevice and Remove-ADComputer.  If I
>>>> venture down that path, ill share my results.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Chris Carbone <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Currently I have UDI popping up so helpdesk can change name, date,
>>>> time, and choose software etc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That is good to know if the name stays the same, no new object is
>>>> created. But need to also figure out how we can keep that same object even
>>>> if the name changes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Whitcher
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 02, 2015 10:52 AM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm
>>>> object
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How are you changing the computer name?  Are you entering the computer
>>>> name manually at the start of the task sequence?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In my environment, we use a standard naming convention for
>>>> workstations, so the names never change.  Our OSD task sequence is fully
>>>> automated, so that after initiating the pxe boot there is no user
>>>> interaction required.  SCCM already knows the computer, by MAC and GUID, so
>>>> the task sequence assigns the computer the same name that it had before.
>>>> No duplicate computers are created in SCCM or AD.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Chris Carbone <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  So this is great, now we can reimage without dealing with deleting
>>>> computers in SCCM first.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But there is still a problem. When I reimage a computer now, and change
>>>> the name of it. Both entries appear in AD and SCCM. What I would like to
>>>> happen is the name changes the existing object, and doesn’t create a new
>>>> object. Maybe I can add a couple steps to my TS that deletes the old
>>>> computer name/object before it starts imaging? Just throwing ideas out
>>>> there.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I’m currently testing this out also. If I leave the computer name the
>>>> same, what happens when you reimage.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again for everyones help!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Whitcher
>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 02, 2015 9:52 AM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm
>>>> object
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I know it's one of those things that people will argue about until the
>>>> end of time, but I'm in the "Never deploy anything to the 'All Systems'
>>>> collection" camp.  ESPECIALLY an OSD task sequence...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Ryan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Think of it this way, if you deploy it correctly to All Systems then
>>>> no one can accidentally deploy it there! You can't deploy a task sequence
>>>> twice to the same collection.
>>>>
>>>> Just make sure you have the song Danger Zone playing in the background
>>>> when you make the deployment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Andreas Hammarskjöld <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  If you are on 2012, deply to a collection of your liking, ”All
>>>> systems” being mentioned and could be safe/unsafe. Just make sure nobody
>>>> has right to change the PXE/USB/MEDIA flag to “Clients”, and use
>>>> “Available” rather than “Required”.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My 2 swedish kroners!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> //A
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
>>>> *Sent:* den 1 april 2015 23:49
>>>> *To:* mssms
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm
>>>> object
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "You can't change a deployment from available to required without doing
>>>> some very unsupported things in the database.
>>>> Can it be done in SCCM 2007? If so, maybe a deployment to All Systems
>>>> is just what you need to get that upgrade started!"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you're right, I was thinking SCCM 2007 and the idea of it used to
>>>> terrify me haha.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ryan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  You can't change a deployment from available to required without
>>>> doing some very unsupported things in the database.
>>>>
>>>> Can it be done in SCCM 2007? If so, maybe a deployment to All Systems
>>>> is just what you need to get that upgrade started!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:45 AM, ccollins9 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  "Advertise the task sequence to All Systems, boot media/pxe only.
>>>> That’s how we’re doing it in the 2012 system we’re setting up now, seems to
>>>> work like a charm."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't ever recommend anyone do this unless you have reallllllly
>>>> tight control (permissions) over SCCM and ALL the techs working it know it
>>>> well.  All it takes is someone setting that advertisement to "required" and
>>>> then all the computers in your domain will be re-imaged.  Granted there is
>>>> a safety net there with PXE/Boot Media option, but if a computer reboots
>>>> and has PXE enabled, wouldn't it boot to PXE and begin the image
>>>> installation?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My recommendation is to give the lower level technicians access to
>>>> delete machines in certain collections.  SCCM is designed to be used by
>>>> everyone from end-user to the highest tiers of support.  You can lock many
>>>> things down with permissions.  We package the SCCM console and push it to
>>>> all our techs in the IT department.  They have the console, but can only do
>>>> what they have permissions for.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Another method and maybe a safer one if the above scares you---SCCM
>>>> 2012 supports PowerShell commands.  Create a service account with
>>>> permissions to delete objects using the Remove-CMDevice command and script
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Jessie Twaddle <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The unknown systems works great for unknown systems, but what do you do
>>>> when SCCM already knows about the computer and the staff who deploy the
>>>> images have no access to SCCM?  Rather then have them contact Sccm admin
>>>> every time they need to reimage, I just use wds to deploy the base image.
>>>> It would be great to use SCCM always.  If anyone has an automated way
>>>> around this issue, please let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Jessie
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 1, 2015 4:33 AM, "Trond Karstensen" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  I always advertise to «all systems» pxe & media only, and to all
>>>> unknown computers.
>>>>
>>>> And password protect the TS.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Gilbert
>>>> *Sent:* tirsdag 31. mars 2015 22.29
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] RE: Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm
>>>> object
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Available to all unknown systems is the ticket:
>>>> https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn818437.aspx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* [email protected] [
>>>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
>>>> *On Behalf Of *Juelich, Adam
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2015 4:23 PM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm
>>>> object
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rule of thumb is to never deploy anything to 'All Systems.'  Unless
>>>> you're into extreme sports or something....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    *-----------------------------------------------*
>>>>
>>>> *Adam Juelich*
>>>>
>>>> Pulaski Community School District <http://www.pulaskischools.org>
>>>>
>>>> Client Management Specialist
>>>>
>>>> 920-822-6075
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Rob Glodt <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Advertise the task sequence to All Systems, boot media/pxe only.
>>>> That’s how we’re doing it in the 2012 system we’re setting up now, seems to
>>>> work like a charm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rob Glodt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chris Carbone
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2015 1:15 PM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* [mssms] Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm object
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We currently need to delete the computer out of SCCM each time we want
>>>> to image a computer. Is there a way where we can image a computer without
>>>> doing this? We want it to stay in SCCM for asset management from another
>>>> system that is pulling from SCCM.
>>>>
>>>> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
>>>> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>>> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
>>>> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
>>>> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
>>>> me by telephone immediately.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
>>>> is
>>>> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
>>>> confidential
>>>> and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
>>>> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>> please
>>>> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
>>>> original
>>>> message.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
>>>> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>>> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
>>>> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
>>>> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
>>>> me by telephone immediately.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
>>>> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>>> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
>>>> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
>>>> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
>>>> me by telephone immediately.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
>>>> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>>> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
>>>> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
>>>> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
>>>> me by telephone immediately.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



Reply via email to