Ok, so it's automatic then, there isn't a special refresh option that I'm
missing somewhere?

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Juelich, Adam <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Correct.
>
> *-----------------------------------------------*
>
> *Adam Juelich*
>
> Pulaski Community School District <http://www.pulaskischools.org>
>
> Client Management Specialist
>
> 920-822-6075
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:29 AM, ccollins9 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, you said OSD "refresh".  I might not be familiar with that.  I'm
>> assuming a refresh is a reimage where SCCM takes into account that the
>> computer is an existing object in SCCM and AD.  Is this correct?
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Juelich, Adam <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> You don't have to delete ANYTHING in order to do an OSD refresh on a
>>> machine.
>>>
>>> *-----------------------------------------------*
>>>
>>> *Adam Juelich*
>>>
>>> Pulaski Community School District <http://www.pulaskischools.org>
>>>
>>> Client Management Specialist
>>>
>>> 920-822-6075
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:16 AM, ccollins9 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Unless I missed where someone mentioned otherwise, I don't think it's
>>>> possible to re-image without deleting from at least AD.  If you just simply
>>>> rename a computer, SCCM will pick up that change and rename the object
>>>> within SCCM because the GUIDs are the same.  Same with AD, a rename is fine
>>>> because the SID remains the same.  But when you re-image a computer, the AD
>>>> SID and SCCM GUID are now different and it's treated as a new object.  SCCM
>>>> will allow duplicate names with different GUIDs, but AD won't allow
>>>> duplicate names at all.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Chris Carbone <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  The problem is we do not want these objects getting deleted at all.
>>>>> Our ticketing system pulls from SCCM so when you start deleting objects 
>>>>> and
>>>>> adding new objects, our ticketing system is becoming littered with old
>>>>> computer names.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We want to reimage a computer, and if the name is different, we need
>>>>> it to stay associated with the same object in SCCM. We want the object for
>>>>> a computer entered one time, and it always lives in AD/SCCM even if
>>>>> renamed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully this makes sense.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Juelich, Adam
>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 02, 2015 11:45 AM
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm
>>>>> object
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What Steve said...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You should have a naming convention and then stick to it to prevent
>>>>> the issues you are creating.  Rename the machines at the end or after the
>>>>> fact.  Your TS should be zero-touch unless you're dealing with bare-metal.
>>>>> Otherwise, delete the object and handle it that way.  If the machines are
>>>>> being re-purposed for a different area you'll most likely want to delete
>>>>> the object anyways depending on how you're doing Application deployment.
>>>>> You don't want the machine to automatically get deployed applications it
>>>>> may no longer need (again, depending on how you're deploying and how 
>>>>> you're
>>>>> creating your collections).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    *-----------------------------------------------*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Adam Juelich*
>>>>>
>>>>> Pulaski Community School District <http://www.pulaskischools.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Client Management Specialist
>>>>>
>>>>> 920-822-6075
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:27 AM, ccollins9 <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  How are you all dealing with the object in AD?  AD doesn't allow
>>>>> duplicate names, so AFAIK the only way to make sure the newly imaged
>>>>> computer gets in AD properly is to either first delete the old object in
>>>>> AD, or go into AD, find the computer, right-click and select and click
>>>>> "reset account" before the TS joins the computer to the domain.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This whole thread may lead me to also fully automating this, as we
>>>>> currently have helpdesk members delete the old computer from SCCM and AD
>>>>> first, and if I do automate it, I think my first attempt would be to use
>>>>> the PowerShell commands Remove-CMDevice and Remove-ADComputer.  If I
>>>>> venture down that path, ill share my results.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Chris Carbone <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Currently I have UDI popping up so helpdesk can change name, date,
>>>>> time, and choose software etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That is good to know if the name stays the same, no new object is
>>>>> created. But need to also figure out how we can keep that same object even
>>>>> if the name changes.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Whitcher
>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 02, 2015 10:52 AM
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm
>>>>> object
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> How are you changing the computer name?  Are you entering the computer
>>>>> name manually at the start of the task sequence?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In my environment, we use a standard naming convention for
>>>>> workstations, so the names never change.  Our OSD task sequence is fully
>>>>> automated, so that after initiating the pxe boot there is no user
>>>>> interaction required.  SCCM already knows the computer, by MAC and GUID, 
>>>>> so
>>>>> the task sequence assigns the computer the same name that it had before.
>>>>> No duplicate computers are created in SCCM or AD.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Chris Carbone <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  So this is great, now we can reimage without dealing with deleting
>>>>> computers in SCCM first.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But there is still a problem. When I reimage a computer now, and
>>>>> change the name of it. Both entries appear in AD and SCCM. What I would
>>>>> like to happen is the name changes the existing object, and doesn't create
>>>>> a new object. Maybe I can add a couple steps to my TS that deletes the old
>>>>> computer name/object before it starts imaging? Just throwing ideas out
>>>>> there.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm currently testing this out also. If I leave the computer name the
>>>>> same, what happens when you reimage.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks again for everyones help!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Whitcher
>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 02, 2015 9:52 AM
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm
>>>>> object
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I know it's one of those things that people will argue about until the
>>>>> end of time, but I'm in the "Never deploy anything to the 'All Systems'
>>>>> collection" camp.  ESPECIALLY an OSD task sequence...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Ryan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Think of it this way, if you deploy it correctly to All Systems then
>>>>> no one can accidentally deploy it there! You can't deploy a task sequence
>>>>> twice to the same collection.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just make sure you have the song Danger Zone playing in the background
>>>>> when you make the deployment.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Andreas Hammarskjöld <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  If you are on 2012, deply to a collection of your liking, "All
>>>>> systems" being mentioned and could be safe/unsafe. Just make sure nobody
>>>>> has right to change the PXE/USB/MEDIA flag to "Clients", and use
>>>>> "Available" rather than "Required".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My 2 swedish kroners!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> //A
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9
>>>>> *Sent:* den 1 april 2015 23:49
>>>>> *To:* mssms
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm
>>>>> object
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "You can't change a deployment from available to required without
>>>>> doing some very unsupported things in the database.
>>>>> Can it be done in SCCM 2007? If so, maybe a deployment to All Systems
>>>>> is just what you need to get that upgrade started!"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you're right, I was thinking SCCM 2007 and the idea of it used to
>>>>> terrify me haha.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ryan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  You can't change a deployment from available to required without
>>>>> doing some very unsupported things in the database.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can it be done in SCCM 2007? If so, maybe a deployment to All Systems
>>>>> is just what you need to get that upgrade started!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:45 AM, ccollins9 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  "Advertise the task sequence to All Systems, boot media/pxe only.
>>>>> That's how we're doing it in the 2012 system we're setting up now, seems 
>>>>> to
>>>>> work like a charm."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I wouldn't ever recommend anyone do this unless you have reallllllly
>>>>> tight control (permissions) over SCCM and ALL the techs working it know it
>>>>> well.  All it takes is someone setting that advertisement to "required" 
>>>>> and
>>>>> then all the computers in your domain will be re-imaged.  Granted there is
>>>>> a safety net there with PXE/Boot Media option, but if a computer reboots
>>>>> and has PXE enabled, wouldn't it boot to PXE and begin the image
>>>>> installation?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My recommendation is to give the lower level technicians access to
>>>>> delete machines in certain collections.  SCCM is designed to be used by
>>>>> everyone from end-user to the highest tiers of support.  You can lock many
>>>>> things down with permissions.  We package the SCCM console and push it to
>>>>> all our techs in the IT department.  They have the console, but can only 
>>>>> do
>>>>> what they have permissions for.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Another method and maybe a safer one if the above scares you---SCCM
>>>>> 2012 supports PowerShell commands.  Create a service account with
>>>>> permissions to delete objects using the Remove-CMDevice command and script
>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Jessie Twaddle <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The unknown systems works great for unknown systems, but what do you
>>>>> do when SCCM already knows about the computer and the staff who deploy the
>>>>> images have no access to SCCM?  Rather then have them contact Sccm admin
>>>>> every time they need to reimage, I just use wds to deploy the base image.
>>>>> It would be great to use SCCM always.  If anyone has an automated way
>>>>> around this issue, please let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jessie
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 1, 2015 4:33 AM, "Trond Karstensen" <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  I always advertise to <<all systems>> pxe & media only, and to all
>>>>> unknown computers.
>>>>>
>>>>> And password protect the TS.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Gilbert
>>>>> *Sent:* tirsdag 31. mars 2015 22.29
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] RE: Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm
>>>>> object
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Available to all unknown systems is the ticket:
>>>>> https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn818437.aspx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [
>>>>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Juelich, Adam
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2015 4:23 PM
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm
>>>>> object
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rule of thumb is to never deploy anything to 'All Systems.'  Unless
>>>>> you're into extreme sports or something....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    *-----------------------------------------------*
>>>>>
>>>>> *Adam Juelich*
>>>>>
>>>>> Pulaski Community School District <http://www.pulaskischools.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Client Management Specialist
>>>>>
>>>>> 920-822-6075
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Rob Glodt <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Advertise the task sequence to All Systems, boot media/pxe only.
>>>>> That's how we're doing it in the 2012 system we're setting up now, seems 
>>>>> to
>>>>> work like a charm.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob Glodt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chris Carbone
>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2015 1:15 PM
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* [mssms] Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm object
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We currently need to delete the computer out of SCCM each time we want
>>>>> to image a computer. Is there a way where we can image a computer without
>>>>> doing this? We want it to stay in SCCM for asset management from another
>>>>> system that is pulling from SCCM.
>>>>>
>>>>> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
>>>>> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>>>> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
>>>>> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
>>>>> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
>>>>> me by telephone immediately.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
>>>>> attachments, is
>>>>> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
>>>>> confidential
>>>>> and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
>>>>> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
>>>>> please
>>>>> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
>>>>> original
>>>>> message.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
>>>>> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>>>> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
>>>>> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
>>>>> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
>>>>> me by telephone immediately.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
>>>>> intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>>>> disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance
>>>>> on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly
>>>>> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
>>>>> me by telephone immediately.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential
>>>>> information intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as
>>>>> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>>>>> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any
>>>>> action in reliance on the contents of this electronic mail transmission is
>>>>> strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
>>>>> please notify me by telephone immediately.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



Reply via email to