>At the time that I wrote fasctopy 3.0, memman was
>still a very promising initiative. Too bad that most people choose to
ignore
>it. Memman is fast enough for the memory mapper control. Provided that you
>use some tricks ;-). Perhaps that the need for these tricks where the main
>reason why most people ignored memman. It was rather complicated to support
>memman and still have a good performance.

I don't like it because it returns to basic and then calls Dos again etc...
takes quite a lot of loadingtime and it doen't look very nice...


~Grauw


****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****

Reply via email to