> > If Windows wasn't good and easy-to-use then it wouldn't have been
> > installed
> > on (almost) every new PC.
>
> Hold it there!!
> Most PC-buyers are a bunch of lamers, who bought a PC:
> 1-To 'keep up with time'
> 2-To play games
> 3-There kids needed a computer for school
> 4-To visit all those pornsites on the net
If you want to play games or buy it for your kids, then you're a lamer?
> They have a hard time already, learning how to click and double clik on
> the buttons and they are happy that there is already an OS on their PC.
> WATHEVER that OS may be.
Well to me it seems that Win98 is a lot easier than Linux or Dos.
So it definately DOES matter which OS it is.
> The fact that it's the default installed OS is just good marketing from
> M$. If IBM had done a better job promoting OS/2 (technically better then
> 95 when they both came out), the world would now have an other look.
Ah, OS/2 Warp... yes. I forgot about that. One difference: a lot of
developers already programmed for Windows (or Dos). Why would they use Warp
if they already know how to program Windows?
~Grauw
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
Visit the Datax homepage at http://datax.cjb.net/
... Live long and prosper...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
