> > MCCW is still a continuation of MCCM! Sort of. This is just something
> Frank
> > wants. Don't make that big deal out of it.
>
> Well then please don't talk about NOT having a deadline and NOT publishing
> the articles in one go.
> Pwah.
Why? Because that was not done with MCCM? Well, it HAD to be done with MCCM...
Now we can choose.
> > > Nah... don't know TeX.
> >
> > So what? The example was clear, wasn't it! So now you leared one LaTeX
> > command, and now you can make clear that a certain part of your sentence
> needs
> > to be emphasized. But if I were you, I'd try to learn some more about
> LaTeX,
> > because it teaches you a lot about layout, typography and more of these
> things.
>
> Sorry, ain't got Linux and I don't think I will get it in the near future
> either (my father doesn't want it).
Who was talking about Linux?
Check for example www.ntg.nl, for TeX for all kinds of platforms. Including
DOS. But hey, I was only talking about the MANUAL of LaTeX and a book of Knuth
(who wrote TeX). Nothing said about Linux.
> > I know cgi a little bit (actually, Perl), but I'm not getting further than
> > simple mail-script. Anyway, it's really not that important (yet). First we
> > need articles and permanent authors.
>
> Me neither, actually, but something can be done about that!
> Anyways, I agree with you, it is of later order. But still it's a very nice
> idea.
Sure!
> No no no not at all... That would (ofcourse) be nice too, but that was not
> the idea.
> You can't hyperlink to the older magazines, can you? :)
Well, if we put them online in some way... ;-)
> > So: still one week to go! ;-)
>
> Way to go!
But: I only recieved one article. And that one needs to be cleaned up first.
> > Yup, lots of lamers around...
>
> I don't think this sounds very nice :(
> I think it's just a FACT! Ask Frank, if he needed an article from my father
> and he didn't get it yet, he called him.
Ofcourse. That is one of the dirty jobs of a chief-editor.
> > Parallax homepage. It's not important if people check the MCCW only once a
> > month. Then he still has all articles in one go! (From his point of view!)
>
> Owww... dammit! No, not ALL are like me, but at least some!
> I just think it would be way cooler if all articles came at the same time.
>
> But what does Frank think about this?
He proposed the idea of publishing articles when they are finished, with the
same argumentation as I gave.
> > Nope. Unless you guys out there really start to write!
>
> And then I mean, really, really, really start to write!
Yes, I need them in one week!
> > More important: getting articles and authors first!
>
> Hmmm...
> Don't think so.
> I mean, why making this sequential? Then we might get trouble with the Von
> Neumann-principle. And we wouldn't want that, would we?
Exsqueeze me? Without articles the whole MCCW will not become real.
> > Nope, I guess not. (Don't think that I do!)
>
> *sigh* again, okay I KNOW Star Wars is a tiny little bit childish sometimes
> (I think Anakin is stupid)... But you should definately see it.
I saw it. But I may be stupid.
About Eric's message: he is sooooooo right. He actually says what I meant to
say... :-) Thanks pal!
Grtjs, Manuel ((m)ICQ UIN 41947405)
PS: MSX 4 EVER! (Questions? See: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/)
PPS: Visit my home page at http://bilderbeek.tsx.org/
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (www.stack.nl/~wiebe/mailinglist/)
****
