It is only me who thinks that we need with some urgence a C or BASIC
>>] compiler with the same integrated interface of Compass??
>> Nobody is stopping you to make one...
>>
>> Though, I consider KUN-BASIC rather integrated with the powerfull MSX
>BASIC
>> interactive development environment. You can use the MSX BASIC IDE to
>write,
>> test, run, save and load kun-basic programs, without having the need to
>start
>> separate editors, compilers and the whole lot...
>
>The MSX BASIC environment sure has its merits, but I _really_ find the
>hassling
>with linenumbers etc backwards. An idea could be to develop a completely
>new
>MSX BASIC version (would be v5.0 or something?)
---------------------------
There's definitely need for a new MSX-BASIC version.
A new MSX-Basic version with faster routines than the
current basic version.
So it will be a better language to use for games/demo's
There are a lot of msx-users who want to make games/demo's etc.
but it's just impossible for them, because of the slowness of
msx-basic.
Maybe a new and faster (still easy) basic version will lead to new
games/programs/demos and msx-groups.
Or am I to optimistic?
Mzzl,
Chaos
TeddyWareZ
(P.S. D-fader, you're our coder, and you've got the abilities to make a
new MSX-Basic, go to work, now!!! :) )
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
