> Ok so you don't like trackers....
> who cares! lots of other HOBBY
> composers do like trackers, just
> because they are user-friendly.
I don't care what editor use other
composers.
> I agree moonblaster isn't the
> perfect music editor, but hey
No, it is not. As a matter of fact,
it is really ugly.
> if I want to do professional stuff
> I use my pc, if I want to have a
> lot of fun, I use my msx. And I
> think you don't remember the charm
> of working on a good ol' msx
> with all it's limitations. I really though
MOONBLASTER is NOT a limitation of MSX!!
MOONBLASTER is a limitation itself.
There is a lot of good editors on MSX (most
of them japanese programs).
> I don't agree at all ..... Trackers are BAD
> because they have 'phisical' limitations.
> Using a tracker, MoonBlaster for example,
> I cannot make irregular groups like
> triplets, etc., I can't record live phrases,
>
> sample ram, ever heard of it?
I don't have any sample RAM on my MSX.
> I can't achieve a good timing resolution,
>
> be creative, you'll find something
I accept MSX limitations, but not *programs*
limitations. MSX is powerful enough to have
a good resolution on sequencing.
> I can't use different measures than 4/4...
>
> try reading the manual... you'll see it can be done.
Only by ENDOP, I can not define, for example,
a 17/64 measure.
> Pathetic.
>
> if all of this is so pathetic, why don't you sell your msx?
Because my MSX is great, but trackers aren't :)
Greetings,
Jose Angel Morente ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
*MSX DREAMS* ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Visit MSX Warau Home Page
http://msxjam.web.com
msxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsxmsx
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****