> I am not opposed to GConf, but I would like to hear some other opinions
> (besides "GConf is like the registry") on which format we should use for
> storing configuration going forward.
My vote is for XML or text, definaately not GCConf, unless you want
to tie it directly to GNOME. With the recent patch to remove GNOME support
from Multisync ("text-only" mode), this becomes even more important.
Any technology which ties itself intimately to one particular
operating environment, is not going to extend itself easily into others.
d.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Multisync-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-devel
