On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Tom Foottit wrote: > After some discussion on IRC, we wanted to solicit opinions on how we > are going to do storage of the configuration of the sync engine (and the > plugins) for 0.90. > > Right now we have configuration stored in: > * GConf > * XML Files Well, if you're going to go with XML-RPC (which persionally I'd rather see over D-BUS, which has fewer implementations), I'd say use XML for configuration files too, just for consistency. > * Basic text (i.e. not XML) This is actually what I prefer, but everyone seems to want something else these days. > > We need to standardize on something going forward. I am not opposed to > GConf, but I would like to hear some other opinions (besides "GConf is > like the registry") on which format we should use for storing > configuration going forward. > > Tom > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Multisync-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-devel >
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Multisync-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-devel
