Yes, I completely agree with the Rozhdestvesnky example. Brant Gibbard Toronto, ON http://bgibbard.ca
> -----Original Message----- > From: musicbrainz-style-boun...@lists.musicbrainz.org > [mailto:musicbrainz-style-boun...@lists.musicbrainz.org] On > Behalf Of symphonick > Sent: May-30-11 10:30 AM > To: MusicBrainz Style Discussion > Subject: Re: [mb-style] CSG: research for Release names & artists > > On Mon, 30 May 2011 16:27:36 +0200, Brant Gibbard > <bgibb...@ca.inter.net> > wrote: > > > Update: I'm still getting used to the new format in SNG, > and I never > > noticed the "Artist as credited" field, which is now what I > guess you > > mean in the > > > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:symphonick/Unofficial_CSG_release_nam > > es issue I mentioned. I am less opposed to that, but I > still don't see > > any point in doing that when it is clear that the only reason for > > entering only a surname on the cover is lack of space for a > full name > > rather than "artistic intent" > > > Like all caps, you mean? Noted. > > There's a better explanation (& use of it?) in the howto. > > /symphonick > > _______________________________________________ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
