On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 08:44:36PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 06:48:28PM +0100, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > > Apart from Linux's kernel, are there that many projects that still use > > lists to share and review code? > > So 5000+ developers a year from 450+ different companies doesn't show > that this type of development model really does work for any project of > a reasonable size? Why would you need any other examples? :)
IMO, there's not one way of doing it that will make everyone happy, but I think an approach that is flexible and supports both workflows is ideal for a tool like Mutt. While it is, after all, a mail client, I do think a lot of people who work with software or infrastructure are pretty used to GitHub and similar tools, and I'd argue that there are some advantages / benefits to at least supporting this approach along with other approaches.. w
