Hi Will, On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 03:18:43PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 08:44:36PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 06:48:28PM +0100, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > > > Apart from Linux's kernel, are there that many projects that still use > > > lists to share and review code? > > > > So 5000+ developers a year from 450+ different companies doesn't show > > that this type of development model really does work for any project of > > a reasonable size? Why would you need any other examples? :) > > IMO, there's not one way of doing it that will make everyone happy, but > I think an approach that is flexible and supports both workflows is > ideal for a tool like Mutt. > > While it is, after all, a mail client, I do think a lot of people who > work with software or infrastructure are pretty used to GitHub and > similar tools, and I'd argue that there are some advantages / benefits > to at least supporting this approach along with other approaches..
I'd say people that work with tools like mutt(1) are not so used to github and similar tools. It's a very special subset from the generic category "people that work with software". I'd hate to work with github, FWIW. Have a lovely night! Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
