On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:55:53PM +0200 or thereabouts, Sven Guckes wrote: > > Now if the only reason Reply-To is not honored is the configuration > > of the one's MUA that's answering me, I have to accept that. > > But if there is _another reason_ for this and > > I can do something about it, I'd just like to know... > > if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not* > the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists.
He was asking if there were other headers that other MUAs used instead of Reply-To. Presumably, Mutt could then be configured to add those *in addition to* the normal Reply-To header. IMO, perfectly on topic and a subject which I'm interested in learning more about as well. --kurt
