Thank you for your response Rocco,
It is like always....at work - windows, home - linux...that's how we
live. Sad....
Btw, why does use of inline ("traditional") PGP strongly discouraged?
Best,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Rocco Rutte
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 12:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Digital signature - .dat file in Outlook
Hi,
* Paul Grinberg wrote:
> Does anyone know workaround for the problem with Outlook handling of
> the digital signatures. (.dat file)
I think I once read something about an Outlook plugin that would support
it. If that's not an option, you can try to send inline ("traditional")
PGP though that's strongly discouraged. It doesn't give you a pointless
attachment but some pointless lines of text at top/bottom of your mail.
Of course, the best solution is to not use any crypto stuff when sending
to Outlook recipients (mutt can help automize that using address
groups).
Rocco
