Hi, * Alexander Dahl wrote:
> > PGP though that's strongly discouraged. It doesn't give you a pointless > > attachment but some pointless lines of text at top/bottom of your mail. > Did you ever try to explain this to the developers of Enigmail (GnuPG > extension for Mozilla Thunderbird)? No, not yet. > They have the contrary opinion. This > topic is discussed every now and then on the enigmail mailing list and > they always say, they stay with inline signatures by default because > PGP/MIME is some kind of evil. ;-) Yeah, it's evil because it's not the optimal solution but it works reliably (enough). I wonder what enigmail does with mails like this: http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=121916523318263&w=2 Is there a public archive of the enigmail list? Reading up on the subject could be fun I guess. Rocco
pgpTLPwnZgTTe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
