On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 06:35:17PM +0800, bill lam wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009, lee wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got an email with these headers:
> >
> >
> > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > X-Spam_score: 4.4
> > X-Spam_score_int: 44
> > X-Spam_bar: ++++
> >
> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
> > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="de" lang="de">
> > <head>
> >
> >
>
> I suspect that email is mal-formated. The html is included inline
> rather than as a multipart attachment. Did you see the any
> attachments in the attachment page?
It doesn't seem to have attachments: I have the counter displayed in
the message list, and it's 0 --- though that counter isn't always
right. When I look at the message with 'v', I'm seeing:
q:Exit s:Save |:Pipe p:Print ?:Help
I 1 <no description>
[text/html, quoted, iso-8859-1, 7.2K]
So that would be inline, I guess? Is there an RFC specifying that HTML
source must not be inlined? I'd need something to point the sender of
the message to to have them change it.
