On Sat, 07 Nov 2009, lee wrote: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 06:35:17PM +0800, bill lam wrote: > > On Tue, 03 Nov 2009, lee wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've got an email with these headers: > > > > > > > > > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > X-Spam_score: 4.4 > > > X-Spam_score_int: 44 > > > X-Spam_bar: ++++ > > > > > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" > > > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> > > > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="de" lang="de"> > > > <head> > > > > > > > > > > I suspect that email is mal-formated. The html is included inline > > rather than as a multipart attachment. Did you see the any > > attachments in the attachment page? > > It doesn't seem to have attachments: I have the counter displayed in > the message list, and it's 0 --- though that counter isn't always > right. When I look at the message with 'v', I'm seeing: > > > q:Exit s:Save |:Pipe p:Print ?:Help > I 1 <no description> > [text/html, quoted, iso-8859-1, 7.2K] > > > So that would be inline, I guess? Is there an RFC specifying that HTML > source must not be inlined? I'd need something to point the sender of > the message to to have them change it.
My isp also send this kind of machine generated monthly statement. I guess they only care if it looks ok using outlook and not rfc compliant. -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3