On Thursday 30 May 2013 13:38:36 Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Mick <[email protected]> [05-30-13 08:21]: > > On Thursday 30 May 2013 02:05:48 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > /s/set/reset/ > > > > Sorry I don't understand ... I still don't understand what "/s/set/reset/" means in this context, or how I am meant to apply it. :-/ > > I have created a ~/.mutt/tmp/ directory now, but this makes no odds in > > terms of performance. > > You remarked about having cache files in /var/tmp and /tmp which are not > permanent. The cache files need permanent residence or must be recreated > causing delay. This may or may not be part of the delay you experience. Ah! OK, my /vat/tmp/.mutt is permanent. Not deleted at each reboot. Adding the ~/.mutt/tmp/ made no odds (it would only be used for messages that I opened/modified/composed last time I ran mutt. > I do use imap from two google acc'ts but download the mail, fetchmail to > procmail for delivery. Yes, I'm fast coming to the same conclusion. Accessing really large IMAP mailboxen online is no fun. I thought that caching would make mutt at least as fast as Kmail, but it seems that this is not the case. :-( I'll give tokyo cabinet a try to see if it makes a difference. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
