On 28.04.17 10:44, Darac Marjal wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 07:16:19PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote: > >On 27.04.17 09:21, Darac Marjal wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at > 08:54:45PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote: >> > OK, so how does one do that > within mutt? >> >> I would suggest that the most prudent approach is to > use a lightweight >> markup language (LML). LMLs tend to be designed ...
Darac, I'm sorry, but that run-on corruption of email quoting is quite unreadable. A failed experiment perhaps? Further down, the lack of leading ">>" makes some lines of my post appear to be part of your reply - very confusing. (I have mutt display unquoted text in green, quoted in yellow, in addition to the ">>" quoting. Corrupt those boundaries, and it's unclear what's coming or going.) FWIW, I did see two red words and one underlined in the soup, so mutt can render your rich text - just not formatted so it can be read. Note: Vim preserves email quoting when flowing a paragraph with gq}. Erik
