At 04:08 PM 1/30/2010, you wrote:
Been thinking about the combination of sorted and manual lists. I
believe the whole reason for the manual list was to let MLO help
facilitate the use of Forster's autofocus technique.
Perhaps that is the main user group, but that doesn't mean it won't
be useful for all kinds of things. But it seems to me you are
putting a usage model onto MLO based on a particular idealogy (for
example, you are saying that in 2 different programs you would have a
closed list. I use GTD (roughly) and my lists are not closed; they
are very dynamic). MLO is fairly idealogy-neutral and I would hate
to see that change. I think changes should be made in a way to
support rather than inhibit different ways of using the product, but
not to directly implement particular ones. Maybe I just don't
understand the idea of pages?
I think we already have the ability to put a task onto a manually
sorted discreet list - the new Star field?
Lisa
----------
Lisa Stroyan, mailto:[email protected]
www.empathic-parenting.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
