Thanks I will try this approach for now.  I need to update my tasks first 
and move a bunch to next up.  I missed a few reviews and I have way too 
many active tasks now.  I don't think any view will help until I can get 
the number under control.

On Saturday, June 1, 2019 at 8:59:54 AM UTC-4, wa wa wrote:
>
> What about using advanced view to show the tasks in a date range? I have a 
> view set up for the next 7 and 30 days.
>
> On Tuesday, May 28, 2019 at 2:48:13 PM UTC-5, Susannah wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Dwight for the explanation.  That all makes sense.  I am more just 
>> looking for a more visual display of my tasks.  If I need something more 
>> than that I would use Microsoft project.  In list views I have a really 
>> hard time seeing how badly I am over scheduling myself on one day and 
>> underscheduling on the next.  I use the word scheduling loosely here.  If I 
>> had something like David Timpe mentioned I think that would help 
>> tremendously to better see my work.  I have tried using Kanban flow along 
>> with MLO and it works pretty well except for having things in more than one 
>> place.
>> Susannah
>>
>>
>> On Friday, May 24, 2019 at 10:43:01 AM UTC-4, Dwight wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Susannah, your suggestion of providing a *Gantt chart view *in MLO 
>>> has been popular. I'd like to discuss *some of the factors that could 
>>> make this into a high-cost low-benefit feature.*
>>>
>>> If all you were looking for is a task list with horizontal bars showing 
>>> start date and due date, that's probably available at a moderate cost. But 
>>> I suspect that most if not all of the people asking for this are actually 
>>> hoping for much more - I believe that you will be disappointed with a 
>>> simple Gantt view unless MLO also provides project management features such 
>>> as resource balancing and dynamic rescheduling. 
>>>
>>> Let's start with dates. If you follow anything like the GTD methodology 
>>> for task management, you are not using MLO's Start and Due dates for 
>>> anything like the date you plan to start and finish the task. Start is the 
>>> earliest date on which you could start the task, and Due is the date after 
>>> which the task can no longer be done or is no longer meaningful. For 
>>> example, if I want to buy tickets to the opera, I might put the date they 
>>> go on sale as the start and the date of the performance as the Due - If I 
>>> have not bought them yet on the day after the performance there's no point 
>>> in doing it now. So maybe they are on sale for three months, that does not 
>>> mean that the duration of this task is three man-months. Also, you could 
>>> have a large and complex set of interrelated tasks with complex 
>>> dependencies, some of which could be running behind schedule, and none of 
>>> that makes the tickets go on sale any sooner or causes a delay in the 
>>> performance. MLO is very good at handling dependencies but it does so by 
>>> managing the active/inactive status of each task. Suppose I am buying the 
>>> tickets for a group who want to go to the opera together, so I have to put 
>>> in my order for the tickets, confirm the they are available, then collect 
>>> money from all of the people, pay for and pick up the tickets, and 
>>> distribute them. Suppose that takes a month to complete. That means that I 
>>> really should buy them no later than a month before the performance. MS 
>>> Project would reschedule the "buy tickets" task to be due a month before 
>>> the performance. MLO cannot do that because MLO will not reschedule your 
>>> tasks for you.
>>>
>>> In order to handle this simple situation MLO would need four dates 
>>> instead of two - you would add Begin and End which would reflect the plan 
>>> for when you will actually do this task. MLO would be free to reset the 
>>> begin and end dates to reflect your dependencies. 
>>>
>>> You would also need to know the actual effort required for each task, 
>>> usually measured in hours (different from the Effort field, which gets a 
>>> number between 0 and 100, not clear if it's hours, days or just a relative 
>>> scale where 100 means "very big"). And you would need to know how many 
>>> hours per day you have available to work on tasks like this. And which days 
>>> you work and which days you don't work, like weekends and holidays, 
>>> including obscure local holidays. You might need to also track all of the 
>>> other things you spend your work hours on, and all of the people who you 
>>> will need to help you and their availability. If there are scheduled 
>>> resources, like conference rooms or bulldozers you may need some way of 
>>> knowing when and whether they are available. 
>>>
>>> Once MLO can handle all of this, then you need to enter all of this 
>>> information, and even worse, you have to maintain it - when bad weather or 
>>> a broken tool or a long phone call from your Mom throw you off schedule you 
>>> have to remember to update your project plan and see whether the end date 
>>> changed. That's why most projects that use project management tools 
>>> effectively have a full time project administrator (different from the 
>>> project manager) in charge of creating and maintaining project plans and 
>>> spending little or no time actually working to complete the project. A 
>>> single person trying to manage tasks on a project management tool usually 
>>> has an inevitable crisis where you have to choose whether to try as hard as 
>>> you can to get the project done on time and forget updating the project 
>>> plan, or spend your time keeping the plan accurate and not actually 
>>> complete the project.
>>>
>>> For your nice to have feature of finding the critical path, a MLO would 
>>> need further enhancement.
>>>
>>> And this brings me to my primary concern. MLO is in my opinion the 
>>> absolute top of the line in task management apps with tools and features 
>>> that bring power and flexibility seen nowhere else. If the MLO developers 
>>> were to invest in all the things described above, the result would be a 
>>> passable but primitive project management tool missing most of the advanced 
>>> features found in the many currently available project management apps, 
>>> like time tracking to feed payroll, or calculating the cost per value added 
>>> ratio for each task to allow outsourcing or elimination of nonproductive 
>>> tasks. There would be little reason for anyone seeking a project management 
>>> tool to select MLO over the established project management apps, and not 
>>> much chance that the MLO developers could ever recover their investment in 
>>> these enhancements.
>>>
>>> -Dwight
>>>
>>> On 5/22/2019 7:19 AM, Susannah wrote:
>>>
>>> Me too on the Gantt view 
>>> I thought there used to be one on the phone app but I don't see it 
>>> anymore.  Would love one on the desktop version.  Would also like a kanban 
>>> board view but Gantt would be first choice.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, May 21, 2019 at 8:04:35 AM UTC-4, Costa G wrote: 
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> Suggested feature: Gantt chart graphical representation of projects.
>>>> In my opinion, MLO has all the infrastructure to implement this:
>>>> - Task list
>>>> - Dependencies
>>>> - Due date
>>>>
>>>> Tasks do not have to be arranged into hierarchy according to their 
>>>> dependency.
>>>>
>>>> What needs to be changed:
>>>> Commonly on MSproject, projects are constructed by defining the 
>>>> following basic data:
>>>> 1. Kickoff event
>>>> 2. Dependencies between tasks
>>>> 3. Duration of each task.
>>>>
>>>> The most important results of this feature are:
>>>> 1. A graphical representation of the project's structure, - the Gantt 
>>>> chart.
>>>> 2. The outcome, - the project's end date, given the task durations and 
>>>> dependencies.
>>>> 3. (nice to have: )  Calculation of the critical path - branch of the 
>>>> project which is the limiting factor to the completion date.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and hope to see this come to life!
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/98e3da94-b8c7-4808-865d-ca3b851bc336%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/98e3da94-b8c7-4808-865d-ca3b851bc336%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/28ad2a20-85ed-4dbe-8731-3c5c5f9aaa92%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to