On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 09:56 -0500, David Abrahams wrote: > Daniel Kristjansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > *that's* the sort of answer I'm looking for. So does it matter that > Close() doesn't do anything and all the real action happens in the > Channel's destructor? In practice I assume it does not make a difference, but it may break with any change in TVRec that assumes that calling close actually closes the channel class' handle[s].
> Ouch. So my refactoring, which is pulling lots of common source out > of firewirerecorder/firewirechannel into > firewirerecorderbase/firewirechannelbase so that > darwinfirewirerecorder/darwinfirewirechannel can use it too, can't be > tested? It can be tested, as there are people on the dev list that do use the firewirerecorder, but they are not (active?) developers. So you may need to participate in a rather painful change -> e-mail to tester -> interpret logs -> change loop -- Daniel
_______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
