No VC here, unsure if it works, but yeah, we like them and deploy them in pairs for metro-e (ce) and cbh for vlans carried over mpls pw
Reliable for us Aaron > On Aug 25, 2023, at 4:40 PM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 8/25/23 19:16, Tom Beecher wrote: >> >> In my experience and testing with them, you have a decent bit of headroom >> past the published RIB/FIB limits before they'll fall over. > > They are holding up pretty well for us, mainly because we do a lot more BGP > on MX480's than on MX204's. We use the MX204's mainly for peering and CDN > gateways. Where we use them for edge customers, it's a handful of BGP > sessions. > > On MX480 16GB RE's running two full BGP feeds but hundreds of customer > sessions, Add-Paths really eats into RAM. We've had to upgrade some of the > busier routers from 16GB to 64GB RE's, especially on later versions of code > where ROV can also bite into memory on boxes carrying lots of BGP sessions. > > Mark.
