I sincerely doubt there is much demand for *new* 40G these days. Look at the population of 40G members on major IXes.
People have either one 10G, 2 x 10G, or 100G. 40G was a dead-end 9 years ago and much so more now. On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 9:38 AM Aaron Gould <[email protected]> wrote: > some of these port capabilities are weird to me. like on the > ACX7100-48L you can do 4x100 or 8x50, but ONLY one 40g ?! > > me@7100> show chassis pic pic-slot 0 fpc-slot 0 | find 400 > 48 0 1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G > 4x10G 3x100G > 49 0 1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G > 4x10G 3x100G > 50 0 1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G > 4x10G 3x100G > 51 0 1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G > 4x10G 3x100G > 52 0 1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G > 4x10G 3x100G > 53 0 1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G > 4x10G 3x100G > 54 NA 1x10G > > > > > On 8/23/2023 11:29 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > On Wednesday, 23 August, 2023 16:33, "Mark Tinka" <[email protected]> > said: > > > > [faceplate oversubscription] > > > >> On the new ACX line, yes. > > Not Trio, and different PLM :) > > > >> We don't mess around with any other MX products, so not sure (although > >> we are still yet to deploy the MPC10E's and the MX304). > > MX304 (well, strictly LMIC16) has the same restriction, and a need for > another entry in the magic port checker ( > https://apps.juniper.net/home/port-checker/index.html) for restrictions > beyond "SUM(port-speeds) <= 1.6T". > > > > They make sense once you've looked at the block diagram for the thing > and followed the lines, but things like "4x10G breakout can only go in > odd-numbered ports, and you have to leave the corresponding next-lowest > even-numbered port empty" are not instantly obvious. > > > > Thanks, > > Tim. > > > > > -- > -Aaron > >
