> > Are you sure? The way I read it, that policy applies to -customer- > announced routes, not broad Internet routes received from peers and > transit. >
You are reading it correctly. On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 3:15 PM William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:22 AM o...@delong.com <o...@delong.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 21, 2023, at 01:38, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > > > Disadvantages: Expensive IRR. No RPKI. No vote in ARIN elections. No > > > legal clarity regarding the status of your resources. > > > > Expensive IRR? ALTDB is free? > > I don't know anything about ALTDB. RADB is pricey. > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:16 AM owen--- via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > wrote: > > Apparently, Tata is rejecting routes that have neither RPKI nor an > RIR-based IRR record created after 1993. > > Are you sure? The way I read it, that policy applies to -customer- > announced routes, not broad Internet routes received from peers and > transit. > > It still seems unwise, but not entirely insane. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > -- > William Herrin > b...@herrin.us > https://bill.herrin.us/ >
