On 11/02/16 00:34, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > I quoted a PCH peering paper at the Peering Track. (Not violating rules, > talking about myself.) > > The paper is: > > https://www.pch.net/resources/Papers/peering-survey/PCH-Peering-Survey-2011.pdf > > I said “99.97%” of all peering sessions have nothing behind them more than a > “handshake” or an email. It seems I was in error. Mea Culpa. > > The number in the paper, on page one is, 99.52%. > > Hopefully everyone will read the paper, and perhaps help create better data. >
Well, how about crowdsourcing some data? 3145 eBGP settlement-free peering-sessions (v4 and v6 combined) in US and EU. 350k routes recieved over SFI peering. 1 Written contract in EU for SFI 1 Written contract in US for SFI R&E Sector -- Apparently not a peering coordinator. Fredrik "hugge" Korsbäck AS2603