On 2/12/16, 8:56 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Niels Bakker" <nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of niels=na...@bakker.net> wrote:
>* bedard.p...@gmail.com (Phil Bedard) [Sat 13 Feb 2016, 01:40 CET]: >>I was going to ask the same thing, since even for settlement free >>peering between large content providers and eyeball networks there >>are written agreements in place. I would have no clue on the volume >>percentage but it's not going to be near 99%. > >It's much closer to 99% than to 50%, though. Any reference on that? I¹m wondering who (if anyone) is formally measuring / tracking this and seeing the exact trend over time. Thanks Jason
