Hi Bob, I had switched from CVS to the Freescale version because the former's kernel > doesn't support 320 (x) x 240 (h) LCD screen layout. Not sure what to do > about this... >
we are using a 600 x 800 (i.e., 600 pixels wide) LCD, which is not iirc a default configuration. I remember we got down to two alternatives, hacking the original source code (looking for XRES, YRES definitions) or simply running "setportrait left" at system initialization. We've gone with this second choice and it has worked ou well for us. Third, you could try running the other demos, which might give us new >> insights into these issues - perhaps they are related to cpu usage, >> somehow? >> >> > Okay, I'll give them a shot. As I'm not sure what they are supposed to do, > it's difficult to know how their performance agrees or differs from what > they should be doing! You can compile the demos on any linux host and run them just to get a feel for what they should look like. I think it is doable on a windows host as well. In our company, we've downloaded a linux virtual machine and done all the cross-compiling stuff from within it. Good luck, Ricardo.
